Strategies and Models for Teaching English Speaking to Students with Borderline Intellectual Functioning: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Lenny Solo Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Asep Supena Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Setiadi Samsi Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author

Keywords:

Borderline Intellectual Functioning (BIF); Speaking Skills; English as a Foreign Language (EFL); inclusive education; Systematic Literature Review.

Abstract

Students with Borderline Intellectual Functioning (BIF) experience significant challenges in developing English speaking skills due to limitations in working memory, cognitive processing, and linguistic competence. These limitations affect their ability to organize ideas, retrieve vocabulary, and participate effectively in oral communication. Despite the importance of speaking competence in English as a Foreign Language (EFL), research focusing specifically on effective instructional strategies for students with BIF remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to identify effective instructional strategies, appropriate pedagogical approaches, and implementation challenges in teaching English speaking skills to students with BIF and mild intellectual disabilities.

This study employed a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was conducted across electronic databases, including SciSpace, Google Scholar, ArXiv, and PubMed, covering publications from 2010 to 2026. Studies were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nine eligible empirical studies were selected and analyzed using thematic narrative synthesis to identify patterns in instructional strategies, pedagogical approaches, and barriers.

The findings revealed that structured instructional strategies, including direct instruction, visual support, multimedia-assisted learning, communicative speaking activities, and instructional adaptation, significantly improved speaking performance, learner confidence, and participation. Pedagogical approaches such as Direct Instruction, Communicative Language Teaching, and technology-assisted instruction provided structured and supportive learning environments. However, several barriers were identified, including linguistic limitations, heterogeneous classroom abilities, limited instructional resources, insufficient teacher training, and time constraints in assessment and feedback.

These findings highlight the need for structured, scaffolded, and inclusive instructional models to support speaking development among students with BIF

References

Abbeduto, L., & Boudreau, D. (2004). Theoretical Influences on Research on Language Development and Intervention in Individuals With Mental Retardation. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20032

AHMAD, F. F. (2013). Constructing English Sentences Using Multimedia. International Journal of Creative Future and Heritage (Teniat), 1(2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.47252/teniat.v1i2.107

Alhassan, B., & Osei, M. (2022). Effectiveness of Integrating Drawing in Teaching English Language in Intellectual Disability Classroom. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 4(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.250

Alloway, T. P. (2010). Working memory and executive function profiles of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(5), 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01281.x

Amawi, E. M. M. (2024). Evaluation of the Extent to Which Interactive Videos Are Used in Teaching and Their ‎Effects on Developing EFL Among Basic-Stage Students in Aqaba. The Arab Journal for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 16(56), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.20428/ajqahe.v16i56.2205

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford University Press.

Dalilan, Sartika, E., & Lestari, D. I. (2021). The Practices and Obstacles of English Language Teaching in Intellectual Disability Classroom: A Case Study at Special School (SLB) in Palembang. PANYONARA: Journal of English Education, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.19105/panyonara.v3i1.4319

Fitria, T. N. (2025). English Language Teaching (ELT) for Special Needs Learners: Strategies for Visually Impairments Students in Inclusive Education. Journal of English Teaching and Learning, 4(1).

Gökdağ, A., & Ünlü, Ö. (2023). Effectiveness of Teaching English Introductory Phrases with Digital Dialogue Cards to Students with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 838–854. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1344225

Henry, L. A., Messer, D. J., & Nash, G. (2015). Executive functioning and verbal fluency in children with language difficulties. Learning and Instruction, 39, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.001

Hunt, X., Saran, A., White, H., & Kuper, H. (2025). Effectiveness of Interventions for Improving Educational Outcomes for People With Disabilities in Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70016

Kalgotra, R., & Warwal, J. (2019). Effect of Intervention in Teaching Listening and Speaking Skills on Children with Intellectual Disabilities. ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies, (20), 1. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2019-020-kawa

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001

Medina Sánchez, L. (2017). Adaptaciones Metodológicas en el Aula de Lengua Extranjera para el Alumnado con Discapacidad Intelectual Leve: Estudio de Caso. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54150

Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.

Nemes, M. (2024). Teaching a second language to learners with mild intellectual disabilities – a Hungarian case study. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1450095. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1450095

Orío-Aparicio, C., López-Escribano, C., & Bel-Fenellós, C. (2026). Cognitive profile of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning: A systematic review. Intelligence, 114, 101974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2025.101974

Putri, N. S. E., Pratolo, B. W., & Setiani, F. (2019). The Alternative Assessment of EFL Students’ Oral Competence: Practices and Constraints. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 6(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.v6.72-85

Rojas P., L. A., Truyol, M. E., Calderon Maureira, J. F., Orellana Quiñones, M., & Puente, A. (2020). Qualitative Evaluation of the Usability of a Web-Based Survey Tool to Assess Reading Comprehension and Metacognitive Strategies of University Students. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social Computing and Social Media. Design, Ethics, User Behavior, and Social Network Analysis (Vol. 12194, pp. 110–129). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_9

Salvador-Carulla, L., García-Gutiérrez, J. C., Ruiz Gutiérrez-Colosía, M., Artigas-Pallarès, J., García Ibáñez, J., González Pérez, J., Nadal Pla, M., Aguilera Inés, F., Isus, S., Cereza, J. M., Poole, M., Portero Lazcano, G., Monzón, P., Leiva, M., Parellada, M., García Nonell, K., Martínez I Hernández, A., Rigau, E., & Martínez-Leal, R. (2013). Funcionamiento intelectual límite: Guía de consenso y buenas prácticas. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 6(3), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2012.12.001

Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R., & Tassé, M. J. (2021). Twenty Questions and Answers Regarding the 12th Edition of the AAIDD Manual: Intellectual Disability: Definition, Diagnosis, Classification, and Systems of Supports.

Shaw, S. R. (2008). An Educational Programming Framework for a Subset of Students With Diverse Learning Needs: Borderline Intellectual Functioning. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(5), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208314735

Siagian, F. J. Y., Lubis, I. R., Manurung, S. T. J., Tambunan, R. S., & Hutasuhut, M. L. (n.d.). Barriers To Learn Speaking Among Slow Primary Learners.

Sun, W. (2023). The Impact of Automatic Speech Recognition Technology on Second Language Pronunciation and Speaking Skills of EFL Learners: A Mixed Methods Investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1210187

Wieland, J., & Zitman, F. G. (2016). It is time to bring borderline intellectual functioning back into the main fold of classification systems. BJPsych Bulletin, 40(4), 204–206. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.051490

Yulian, R., Ruhama’, U., & Utami, P. Y. (2022). EFL Slow Learners’ Perception in Speaking with Authentic Multimedia Assisted Language Learning. International Journal of Language Education, 6(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i2.21511

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

Strategies and Models for Teaching English Speaking to Students with Borderline Intellectual Functioning: A Systematic Literature Review. (2026). International Conferences on Early Childhood Education Proceedings, 4(1), 1-12. https://pascasarjana-panca-sakti.ac.id/journal/index.php/ICECP/article/view/116